OAI/NumberTheory/JointDickman/Amplification/TrimmedCandidateRoots.lean
3 declarations, 0 contain sorry, 0 declared as axioms
Exact arithmetic identification after removing coefficient tests
- def
OAI.JointDickman.arithmeticCandidateHitline 10 - def
OAI.JointDickman.trimmedCandidatePrimeHitline 14 - theorem
OAI.JointDickman.arithmetic_candidate_hit_eq_trimmedline 22Source documentation
The finite exclusions used here are explicit arithmetic events. Outside them, the original quotient prime sets equal the trimmed residue model.
theorem arithmetic_candidate_hit_eq_trimmed {B L T H M p u : ℕ} {τ C : ℝ} [Fact p.Prime] (I : Finset (BlockCandidateIndex M)) (m : BlockCandidateIndex M → ℕ) (hp : p ∈ auxiliaryPrimes B) (he : ∀ e ∈ I, BlockCandidateAdmissible B L T H τ C e) (heq : ∀ e ∈ I, candidateHigh e*candidateLow e*m e+candidateLow e = candidateQuotient e*(u+(e.1.1.val+1))) (hforce : ∀ e ∈ I, ¬ CandidateForcedWitness B e (fun i => coefficientPrimeSet B (u+(i.val+1)))) (hcoeff : ∀ e ∈ I, p ∈ candidateCoefficientPrimes B e → ¬ p ∣ m e) : arithmeticCandidateHit I p m = trimmedCandidatePrimeHit B I p (blockPrimeHit M p (u : ZMod p)) (u : ZMod p) := by …Mentions: OAI.JointDickman.BlockCandidateIndex, OAI.JointDickman.auxiliaryPrimes, OAI.JointDickman.BlockCandidateAdmissible, OAI.JointDickman.candidateHigh, OAI.JointDickman.candidateLow, OAI.JointDickman.candidateQuotient, OAI.JointDickman.CandidateForcedWitness, OAI.JointDickman.coefficientPrimeSet, OAI.JointDickman.candidateCoefficientPrimes, OAI.JointDickman.arithmeticCandidateHit, OAI.JointDickman.trimmedCandidatePrimeHit, OAI.JointDickman.blockPrimeHit