OAI/Geometry/HarmonicGrowth/Taylor.lean

GitHub source file

12 declarations, 0 contain sorry, 0 declared as axioms

  1. theorem OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.PulseTaylor.quadratic_remainder line 18

    Source documentation

    Two applications of the mean value theorem, retaining the derivative remainder needed for C1 control of a slow pulse.

    theorem quadratic_remainder {f f' f'' : ℝ → ℝ} {C : ℝ}
        (hC : 0 ≤ C)
        (hf : ∀ x ∈ Icc (1/2:ℝ) (3/2),HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
        (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Icc (1/2:ℝ) (3/2),HasDerivAt f' (f'' x) x)
        (hb : ∀ x ∈ Icc (1/2:ℝ) (3/2),|f'' x| ≤ C) :
        ∀ q ∈ Icc (1/2:ℝ) (3/2),
          |f q-f 1-(q-1)*f' 1| ≤ C*(q-1)^2 ∧ |f' q-f' 1| ≤ C*|q-1| := by
    …
  2. theorem OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.PulseTaylor.rpow_remainder line 56

    Source documentation

    The scalar power appearing in the genuine Berger angular operator has a uniform quadratic value remainder AND a uniform linear derivative remainder.

    theorem rpow_remainder (r : ℝ) : ∃ C : ℝ,0 ≤ C ∧
        ∀ q ∈ Icc (1/2:ℝ) (3/2),
          |q^r-1-r*(q-1)| ≤ C*(q-1)^2 ∧
          |r*q^(r-1)-r| ≤ C*|q-1| := by
    …
  3. def OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.PulseTaylor.angular line 97

    Source documentation

    The exact Berger angular coefficient, with b=B_l Id and D=D_J². Here r=1/m, and the outer scalar a^{-2} is applied separately.

    def angular (r : ℝ) (b D : E) (q : ℝ) : E :=
    …

    Mentions: OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.b

  4. def OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.PulseTaylor.angularD line 100
  5. lemma OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.PulseTaylor.angular_eq_berger line 103
  6. lemma OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.PulseTaylor.angular_hasDerivAt line 111
  7. lemma OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.PulseTaylor.angular_one line 119
  8. lemma OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.PulseTaylor.angularD_one line 120
  9. theorem OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.PulseTaylor.angular_remainder line 125

    Source documentation

    Genuine uniform C1 Taylor control of the angular operator, rather than an endpoint assertion or a formal Taylor expansion taken as an axiom.

    theorem angular_remainder (r : ℝ) (b D : E) : ∃ C : ℝ,0 ≤ C ∧
        ∀ q ∈ Icc (1/2:ℝ) (3/2),
          ‖angular r b D q-b-(q-1) • (r • b+D)‖ ≤ C*(q-1)^2 ∧
          ‖angularD r b D q-(r • b+D)‖ ≤ C*|q-1| := by
    …

    Mentions: OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.b, OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.PulseTaylor.angular, OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.PulseTaylor.angularD

  10. lemma OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.PulseTaylor.scaled_value_error line 177

    Source documentation

    Separation of the slowly varying scale from the small pulse. In the source α=a(t)^{-2}, β=a_*^{-2}, δ=z/T.

    lemma scaled_value_error {F b L : E} {α β δ C : ℝ}
        (hF : ‖F-b-δ • L‖ ≤ C*δ^2) :
        ‖α • F-α • b-(β*δ) • L‖ ≤
          |α| *C*δ^2+|α-β| *|δ| *‖L‖ := by
    …

    Mentions: OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.b

  11. lemma OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.PulseTaylor.scaled_deriv_error line 189
  12. theorem OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.PulseTaylor.berger_slow_pulse_remainders line 217

    Source documentation

    Uniform value AND parameter-direction remainders for the exact slowly scaled Berger operator. No coefficient approximation is a hypothesis.

    theorem berger_slow_pulse_remainders (r : ℝ) (b D : E) {M Z : ℝ}
        (hM : 0 ≤ M) (hZ : 0 ≤ Z) :
        ∃ C : ℝ,0 ≤ C ∧ ∀ α β δ τ z zh : ℝ,
          0 ≤ δ → 0 ≤ τ → |α| ≤ M → |α-β| ≤ δ → |z| ≤ Z → |zh| ≤ Z →
          1+τ*z ∈ Set.Icc (1/2:ℝ) (3/2) →
          ‖α • angular r b D (1+τ*z)-α • b-(β*τ*z) • (r • b+D)‖ ≤ C*(δ*τ+τ^2) ∧
          ‖(τ*zh) • (α • angularD r b D (1+τ*z)-β • (r • b+D))‖ ≤ C*(δ*τ+τ^2) := by
    …

    Mentions: OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.b, OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.PulseTaylor.angular, OAI.HarmonicCounterexample.PulseTaylor.angularD