FormalConjectures/OEIS/41.lean

GitHub source file

Explanation legend Lean4 Domain Explanation Language (L4DEL)

L4DEL explanations are a separate layer. They do not change the Lean source. Intuition is explanatory prose; numbered items are a reading path; sources link the wording back to evidence.

L4DEL
Lean4 Domain Explanation Language

Credit: The upstream authors and contributors retain credit for the project and mathematics. lean4-explainer only renders their pinned source and adds the separately disclosed explanation layer.

Project sources: Pinned project documentation, Formal Conjectures paper, arXiv v1

8 declarations, 1 contain sorry, 0 declared as axioms

No powers as partition numbers

There are no partition numbers $a(k)$ of the form $x^m$, with $x,m$ integers $>1$.

Reference: A41

Imports (2)
Imported by 1 file
  1. def OeisA41.a The n-th partition number line 37 source

    Source documentation

    The n-th partition number.

    standard axioms: Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext what this means

    Statement uses: Nat

    Proof uses: Fintype.card, Nat.Partition

    1 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.

    def a (n : ℕ) : ℕ := Fintype.card (Nat.Partition n)
    …
  2. theorem OeisA41.a_0 line 40 source

    standard axioms: Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext what this means

    Statement uses: Eq, Nat, OeisA41.a, OfNat.ofNat

    Proof uses: of_decide_eq_true, id, Bool, Decidable.decide, Bool.true, Eq.refl

    3 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.

    Tactic trace: 1 steps

    Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.

  3. theorem OeisA41.a_1 line 43 source

    standard axioms: Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext what this means

    Statement uses: Eq, Nat, OeisA41.a, OfNat.ofNat

    Proof uses: of_decide_eq_true, id, Bool, Decidable.decide, Bool.true, Eq.refl

    3 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.

    Tactic trace: 1 steps

    Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.

  4. theorem OeisA41.a_2 line 46 source

    extra axioms: _private.0.OeisA41.a_2._native.decide.ax_1 what this means

    Statement uses: Eq, Nat, OeisA41.a, OfNat.ofNat

    Proof uses: of_decide_eq_true

    4 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.

    Tactic trace: 1 steps

    Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.

  5. theorem OeisA41.a_3 line 49 source

    extra axioms: _private.0.OeisA41.a_3._native.decide.ax_1 what this means

    Statement uses: Eq, Nat, OeisA41.a, OfNat.ofNat

    Proof uses: of_decide_eq_true

    4 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.

    Tactic trace: 1 steps

    Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.

  6. theorem OeisA41.a_4 line 52 source

    extra axioms: _private.0.OeisA41.a_4._native.decide.ax_1 what this means

    Statement uses: Eq, Nat, OeisA41.a, OfNat.ofNat

    Proof uses: of_decide_eq_true

    4 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.

    Tactic trace: 1 steps

    Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.

  7. theorem OeisA41.a_5 line 55 source

    extra axioms: _private.0.OeisA41.a_5._native.decide.ax_1 what this means

    Statement uses: Eq, Nat, OeisA41.a, OfNat.ofNat

    Proof uses: of_decide_eq_true

    4 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.

    Tactic trace: 1 steps

    Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.

  8. theorem OeisA41.noPowerPartitionNumber There are no partition numbers $a(k)$ of the form $x^m$, with $x,m$ integers $>1$ sorry line 62 source

    Source documentation

    There are no partition numbers $a(k)$ of the form $x^m$, with $x,m$ integers $>1$. See comment by Zhi-Wei Sun (Dec 02 2013).

    depends on sorry what this means

    Statement uses: Iff, True, Nat, Not, Nat.IsPerfectPower, OeisA41.a

    Proof uses: sorryAx, Lean.Name, Bool.false, Lean.Name.num, Lean.Name.str, Lean.Name.anonymous, OfNat.ofNat

    1 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.

    Tactic trace: 1 steps

    Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.

    theorem noPowerPartitionNumber : answer(sorry) ↔ ∀ k, ¬IsPerfectPower (a k) := by
    …

    Mentions: OeisA41.a