FormalConjectures/OEIS/41.lean
Explanation legend Lean4 Domain Explanation Language (L4DEL)
L4DEL explanations are a separate layer. They do not change the Lean source. Intuition is explanatory prose; numbered items are a reading path; sources link the wording back to evidence.
- L4DEL
- Lean4 Domain Explanation Language
Credit: The upstream authors and contributors retain credit for the project and mathematics. lean4-explainer only renders their pinned source and adds the separately disclosed explanation layer.
Project sources: Pinned project documentation, Formal Conjectures paper, arXiv v1
8 declarations, 1 contain sorry, 0 declared as axioms
No powers as partition numbers
There are no partition numbers $a(k)$ of the form $x^m$, with $x,m$ integers $>1$.
Reference: A41
Imported by 1 file
- def
OeisA41.aThen-th partition number line 37 sourceSource documentation
The
n-th partition number.standard axioms: Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext what this means
Statement uses:
NatProof uses:
Fintype.card,Nat.Partition1 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
def a (n : ℕ) : ℕ := Fintype.card (Nat.Partition n) …
- theorem
OeisA41.a_0line 40 sourcestandard axioms: Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext what this means
Statement uses:
Eq,Nat, OeisA41.a,OfNat.ofNatProof uses:
of_decide_eq_true,id,Bool,Decidable.decide,Bool.true,Eq.refl3 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
- theorem
OeisA41.a_1line 43 sourcestandard axioms: Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext what this means
Statement uses:
Eq,Nat, OeisA41.a,OfNat.ofNatProof uses:
of_decide_eq_true,id,Bool,Decidable.decide,Bool.true,Eq.refl3 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
- theorem
OeisA41.a_2line 46 sourceextra axioms: _private.0.OeisA41.a_2._native.decide.ax_1 what this means
Statement uses:
Eq,Nat, OeisA41.a,OfNat.ofNatProof uses:
of_decide_eq_true4 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
- theorem
OeisA41.a_3line 49 sourceextra axioms: _private.0.OeisA41.a_3._native.decide.ax_1 what this means
Statement uses:
Eq,Nat, OeisA41.a,OfNat.ofNatProof uses:
of_decide_eq_true4 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
- theorem
OeisA41.a_4line 52 sourceextra axioms: _private.0.OeisA41.a_4._native.decide.ax_1 what this means
Statement uses:
Eq,Nat, OeisA41.a,OfNat.ofNatProof uses:
of_decide_eq_true4 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
- theorem
OeisA41.a_5line 55 sourceextra axioms: _private.0.OeisA41.a_5._native.decide.ax_1 what this means
Statement uses:
Eq,Nat, OeisA41.a,OfNat.ofNatProof uses:
of_decide_eq_true4 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
- theorem
OeisA41.noPowerPartitionNumberThere are no partition numbers $a(k)$ of the form $x^m$, with $x,m$ integers $>1$ sorry line 62 sourceSource documentation
There are no partition numbers $a(k)$ of the form $x^m$, with $x,m$ integers $>1$. See comment by Zhi-Wei Sun (Dec 02 2013).
depends on sorry what this means
Statement uses:
Iff,True,Nat,Not, Nat.IsPerfectPower, OeisA41.aProof uses:
sorryAx,Lean.Name,Bool.false,Lean.Name.num,Lean.Name.str,Lean.Name.anonymous,OfNat.ofNat1 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
theorem noPowerPartitionNumber : answer(sorry) ↔ ∀ k, ¬IsPerfectPower (a k) := by …
Mentions: OeisA41.a