FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/143.lean
Explanation legend Lean4 Domain Explanation Language (L4DEL)
L4DEL explanations are a separate layer. They do not change the Lean source. Intuition is explanatory prose; numbered items are a reading path; sources link the wording back to evidence.
- L4DEL
- Lean4 Domain Explanation Language
Credit: The upstream authors and contributors retain credit for the project and mathematics. lean4-explainer only renders their pinned source and adds the separately disclosed explanation layer.
Project sources: Pinned project documentation, Formal Conjectures paper, arXiv v1
3 declarations, 2 contain sorry, 0 declared as axioms
Erdős Problem 143
Reference: erdosproblems.com/143
Imports (1)
- def
Erdos143.WellSeparatedSetLet $A \subseteq (1, \infty)$ be a countably infinite set such that for all $x\neq y\in A$ and integers $k \geq 1$ we have $|kx - y| \geq 1$ line 37 sourceSource documentation
Let $A \subseteq (1, \infty)$ be a countably infinite set such that for all $x\neq y\in A$ and integers $k \geq 1$ we have $|kx - y| \geq 1$.
standard axioms: Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext what this means
Statement uses:
Set,RealProof uses:
And,LE.le,Set.Ioi,OfNat.ofNat,Set.Infinite,Set.Countable,Membership.mem,Ne,Nat,GE.ge,abs,HSub.hSub,HMul.hMul16 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
def WellSeparatedSet (A : Set ℝ) : Prop := …
- theorem
Erdos143.erdos_143.parts.iDoes this imply that $$ \liminf \frac{|A \cap [1,x]|}{x} = 0? $$ sorry line 48 sourceSource documentation
Does this imply that $$ \liminf \frac{|A \cap [1,x]|}{x} = 0? $$
depends on sorry what this means
Statement uses:
Iff,True,Set,Real, Erdos143.WellSeparatedSet,Eq,Filter.liminf,HDiv.hDiv,Set.ncard,Inter.inter,Set.Icc,OfNat.ofNat,Filter.atTopProof uses:
sorryAx,Lean.Name,Bool.false,Lean.Name.num,Lean.Name.str,Lean.Name.anonymous,Nat27 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
theorem erdos_143.parts.i : answer(sorry) ↔ ∀ (A : Set ℝ), WellSeparatedSet A → liminf (fun x => (A ∩ (Set.Icc 1 x)).ncard / x) atTop = 0 := by …Mentions: Erdos143.WellSeparatedSet
- theorem
Erdos143.erdos_143.parts.iiOr $$ \sum_{x \in A} \frac{1}{x \log x} < \infty, $$ sorry line 59 sourceSource documentation
Or $$ \sum_{x \in A} \frac{1}{x \log x} < \infty, $$
depends on sorry what this means
Statement uses:
Set,Real, Erdos143.WellSeparatedSet,Summable,HDiv.hDiv,OfNat.ofNat,HMul.hMul,Membership.mem,Real.log,SummationFilter.unconditionalProof uses:
sorryAx,Lean.Name,Bool.false,Lean.Name.num,Lean.Name.str,Lean.Name.anonymous,Nat29 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
theorem erdos_143.parts.ii (A : Set ℝ) (h : WellSeparatedSet A) : Summable fun (x : A) ↦ 1 / (x * Real.log x) := by …Mentions: Erdos143.WellSeparatedSet