FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/1099.lean
Explanation legend Lean4 Domain Explanation Language (L4DEL)
L4DEL explanations are a separate layer. They do not change the Lean source. Intuition is explanatory prose; numbered items are a reading path; sources link the wording back to evidence.
- L4DEL
- Lean4 Domain Explanation Language
Credit: The upstream authors and contributors retain credit for the project and mathematics. lean4-explainer only renders their pinned source and adds the separately disclosed explanation layer.
Project sources: Pinned project documentation, Formal Conjectures paper, arXiv v1
5 declarations, 4 contain sorry, 0 declared as axioms
Erdős Problem 1099
References:
- erdosproblems.com/1099
- [Er81h] Erdős, P., Some problems and results on additive and multiplicative number theory. Analytic number theory (Philadelphia, Pa., 1980) (1981), 171-182.
- [Vo84] Vose, Michael D., Integers with consecutive divisors in small ratio. J. Number Theory (1984), 233-238.
- [Te87] Tenenbaum, Gérald, Sur un problème extrémal en arithmétique. Ann. Inst. Fourier (1987), 1-18.
Imports (1)
- def
Erdos1099.hFor $\alpha>1$ and the divisors $1=d_1<\cdots<d_{\tau(n)}=n$ of $n$, $$h_\alpha(n) = \sum_i \left( \frac{d_{i+1}}{d_i}-1\right)^\alpha.$$ line 43 sourceSource documentation
For $\alpha>1$ and the divisors $1=d_1<\cdots<d_{\tau(n)}=n$ of $n$, $$h_\alpha(n) = \sum_i \left( \frac{d_{i+1}}{d_i}-1\right)^\alpha.$$
standard axioms: Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext what this means
Statement uses:
Real,NatProof uses:
Finset.sum,Fin,HSub.hSub,Finset.card,Nat.divisors,OfNat.ofNat,Finset.univ,HPow.hPow,HDiv.hDiv,Nat.nth,Dvd.dvd,HAdd.hAdd19 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
noncomputable def h (α : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ℝ := …
- theorem
Erdos1099.erdos_1099sorry line 65 sourcedepends on sorry what this means
Statement uses:
Iff,True,Real,LT.lt,OfNat.ofNat,Exists,Filter.Frequently,Nat,LE.le, Erdos1099.h,Filter.atTopProof uses:
sorryAx,Lean.Name,Bool.false,Lean.Name.num,Lean.Name.str,Lean.Name.anonymous11 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
- theorem
Erdos1099.erdos_1099.variants.factorialIs $h_\alpha(n!)$ bounded? sorry line 72 sourceSource documentation
Is $h_\alpha(n!)$ bounded? Tenenbaum [Te87, Théorème 1] proved that it is, for every $\alpha > 1$.
depends on sorry what this means
Statement uses:
Iff,True,Real,LT.lt,OfNat.ofNat,Exists,Nat,LE.le, Erdos1099.h,Nat.factorialProof uses:
sorryAx,Lean.Name,Bool.false,Lean.Name.num,Lean.Name.str,Lean.Name.anonymous9 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
theorem erdos_1099.variants.factorial : answer(True) ↔ ∀ α : ℝ, 1 < α → ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ n : ℕ, h α n.factorial ≤ C := by …Mentions: Erdos1099.h
- theorem
Erdos1099.erdos_1099.variants.lcmIs $h_\alpha(\mathrm{lcm}(1,\ldots,n))$ bounded? sorry line 79 sourceSource documentation
Is $h_\alpha(\mathrm{lcm}(1,\ldots,n))$ bounded? Tenenbaum [Te87, Théorème 1] proved that it is, for every $\alpha > 1$.
depends on sorry what this means
Statement uses:
Iff,True,Real,LT.lt,OfNat.ofNat,Exists,Nat,LE.le, Erdos1099.h,Finset.lcm,Finset.Icc,idProof uses:
sorryAx,Lean.Name,Bool.false,Lean.Name.num,Lean.Name.str,Lean.Name.anonymous20 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
theorem erdos_1099.variants.lcm : answer(True) ↔ ∀ α : ℝ, 1 < α → ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ n : ℕ, h α ((Finset.Icc 1 n).lcm id) ≤ C := by …Mentions: Erdos1099.h
- theorem
Erdos1099.erdos_1099.variants.ratio_sumErdős remarks that this problem occurred to him when considering $\sum_i \frac{d_{i+1}}{d_i}$ sorry line 90 sourceSource documentation
Erdős remarks that this problem occurred to him when considering $\sum_i \frac{d_{i+1}}{d_i}$. It is easy to see that $\sum_{i} \frac{d_{i+1}}{d_i}> \tau(n)+\log n$, and Erdős asked whether $$\liminf \left(\sum_{i} \frac{d_{i+1}}{d_i}-\tau(n)-\log n\right)<\infty,$$ which follows from the affirmative answer to the main question.
depends on sorry what this means
Statement uses:
Exists,Real,Filter.Frequently,Nat,LE.le,HSub.hSub,Finset.sum,Fin,Finset.card,Nat.divisors,OfNat.ofNat,Finset.univ,HDiv.hDiv,Nat.nth,Dvd.dvd,HAdd.hAdd,Real.log,Filter.atTopProof uses:
sorryAx,Lean.Name,Bool.false,Lean.Name.num,Lean.Name.str,Lean.Name.anonymous34 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
theorem erdos_1099.variants.ratio_sum : ∃ C : ℝ, ∃ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, ∑ i : Fin (n.divisors.card - 1), ((Nat.nth (· ∣ n) (i + 1) : ℝ) / Nat.nth (· ∣ n) i) - n.divisors.card - Real.log n ≤ C := by …