FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/1098.lean
Explanation legend Lean4 Domain Explanation Language (L4DEL)
L4DEL explanations are a separate layer. They do not change the Lean source. Intuition is explanatory prose; numbered items are a reading path; sources link the wording back to evidence.
- L4DEL
- Lean4 Domain Explanation Language
Credit: The upstream authors and contributors retain credit for the project and mathematics. lean4-explainer only renders their pinned source and adds the separately disclosed explanation layer.
Project sources: Pinned project documentation, Formal Conjectures paper, arXiv v1
5 declarations, 3 contain sorry, 0 declared as axioms
Erdős Problem 1098
References:
- erdosproblems.com/1098
- [Ne76] Neumann, B. H., A problem of Paul Erdős on groups. J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A (1976), 467-472.
Imports (1)
- def
Erdos1098.nonCommutingGraphThe non-commuting graph line 35 sourceSource documentation
The non-commuting graph $\Gamma = \Gamma(G)$ of a group
G, with vertices the elements ofGand an edge betweengandhif and only ifgandhdo not commute, $gh \neq hg$.standard axioms: Quot.sound, propext what this means
Statement uses:
Group,SimpleGraphProof uses:
SimpleGraph.mk,Ne,HMul.hMul8 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
def nonCommutingGraph (G : Type*) [Group G] : SimpleGraph G where …
- theorem
Erdos1098.nonCommutingGraph_adjline 40 sourcestandard axioms: Quot.sound, propext what this means
Statement uses:
Group,Iff,SimpleGraph.Adj, Erdos1098.nonCommutingGraph,Ne,HMul.hMulProof uses:
Iff.rfl6 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
- theorem
Erdos1098.erdos_1098Documented declaration: erdos_1098 sorry line 55 sourceSource documentation
Let $G$ be a group and $\Gamma=\Gamma(G)$ be the non-commuting graph, with vertices the elements of $G$ and an edge between $g$ and $h$ if and only if $g$ and $h$ do not commute, $gh\neq hg$.
If $\Gamma$ contains no infinite complete subgraph, then is there a finite bound on the size of complete subgraphs of $\Gamma$?
This was solved by Neumann [Ne76], who proved that $\Gamma$ contains no infinite complete subgraph if and only if the centre of the group has finite index, and noted that if the centre has index $n$ then $\Gamma$ contains no complete subgraph on $>n$ vertices.
depends on sorry what this means
Statement uses:
Iff,True,Group,Set,SimpleGraph.IsClique, Erdos1098.nonCommutingGraph,Set.Finite,Exists,Nat,Finset,LE.le,Finset.cardProof uses:
sorryAx,Lean.Name,Bool.false,Lean.Name.num,Lean.Name.str,Lean.Name.anonymous,OfNat.ofNat7 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
theorem erdos_1098 : answer(True) ↔ ∀ (G : Type*) [Group G], (∀ s : Set G, (nonCommutingGraph G).IsClique s → s.Finite) → ∃ n : ℕ, ∀ s : Finset G, (nonCommutingGraph G).IsClique (s : Set G) → s.card ≤ n := by …Mentions: Erdos1098.nonCommutingGraph
- theorem
Erdos1098.erdos_1098.variants.center_finiteIndexNeumann [Ne76] proved that $\Gamma$ contains no infinite complete subgraph if and only if the centre of the group has finite index sorry line 66 sourceSource documentation
Neumann [Ne76] proved that $\Gamma$ contains no infinite complete subgraph if and only if the centre of the group has finite index.
depends on sorry what this means
Statement uses:
Group,Iff,Set,SimpleGraph.IsClique, Erdos1098.nonCommutingGraph,Set.Finite,Subgroup.FiniteIndex,Subgroup.centerProof uses:
sorryAx,Lean.Name,Bool.false,Lean.Name.num,Lean.Name.str,Lean.Name.anonymous,OfNat.ofNat,Nat1 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
theorem erdos_1098.variants.center_finiteIndex (G : Type*) [Group G] : (∀ s : Set G, (nonCommutingGraph G).IsClique s → s.Finite) ↔ (Subgroup.center G).FiniteIndex := by …Mentions: Erdos1098.nonCommutingGraph
- theorem
Erdos1098.erdos_1098.variants.upper_boundNeumann [Ne76] noted that if the centre has index $n$ then $\Gamma$ contains no complete subgraph on $>n$ vertices sorry line 76 sourceSource documentation
Neumann [Ne76] noted that if the centre has index $n$ then $\Gamma$ contains no complete subgraph on $>n$ vertices.
depends on sorry what this means
Statement uses:
Group,Subgroup.FiniteIndex,Subgroup.center,SimpleGraph.CliqueFree, Erdos1098.nonCommutingGraph,HAdd.hAdd,Nat,Subgroup.index,OfNat.ofNatProof uses:
sorryAx,Lean.Name,Bool.false,Lean.Name.num,Lean.Name.str,Lean.Name.anonymous6 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
theorem erdos_1098.variants.upper_bound (G : Type*) [Group G] [(Subgroup.center G).FiniteIndex] : (nonCommutingGraph G).CliqueFree ((Subgroup.center G).index + 1) := by …Mentions: Erdos1098.nonCommutingGraph