2.lean`

Explanation legend Lean4 Domain Explanation Language (L4DEL)

L4DEL explanations are a separate layer. They do not change the Lean source. Intuition is explanatory prose; numbered items are a reading path; sources link the wording back to evidence.

L4DEL: Lean4 Domain Explanation Language

Annotation provenance. This overlay contains 10 curated AI-written annotations and 7190 mechanical source-derived annotations. They have not been human-reviewed as explanations; treat them as unverified and not mathematical authority. Retained generation history: The 71 original curated annotations were produced in a Claude Sonnet 5.5 session at medium effort; Claude Opus 5.5 is recorded in that session as the advisor model, not the direct author. The bulk source-derived expansion was generated mechanically from pinned source comments by tooling developed in a GPT-5.6 Sol session at ultra reasoning; GPT-5.6 Sol did not originate the quoted source prose. On 2026-10-17 the mechanically generated source-comment annotations of the Formal Conjectures, Carleson, FLT, PFR, CompFiles, Mathematics in Lean and Theorem Proving in Lean overlays were regenerated by the same generator after three corrections made in a Claude Sonnet 5.5 session: titles no longer cut a sentence inside mathematics or end on a dangling word, workflow markers are removed from the quoted prose, and declaration names follow the scanner's namespace resolution. The boilerplate step line was dropped, and comments that were only a row of dashes no longer yield annotations. No new prose was written and no human review is claimed.

Credit: The upstream authors and contributors retain credit for the project and mathematics. lean4-explainer only renders their pinned source and adds the separately disclosed explanation layer.

Project sources: Pinned project documentation, Formal Conjectures paper, arXiv v1

5 declarations, 1 contain sorry, 0 declared as axioms

TxGraffiti Conjecture 2: zero forcing versus independence (cubic graphs)

Reference: arxiv/2507.17780 In Reverie Together: Ten Years of Mathematical Discovery with a Machine Collaborator by Randy Davila, Boris Brimkov, Ryan Pepper

Conjecture 2 (open since 2017) asserts that for every connected graph $G$ with maximum degree at most $3$ and $G \ne K_4$, $$Z(G) \le \alpha(G) + 1,$$ where $Z(G)$ is the zero forcing number and $\alpha(G)$ the independence number.

Imports (1)

FormalConjecturesUtil

def Arxiv.«2507.17780».zeroForcingStep One step of the zero forcing colour-change rule: add to $S$ every vertex $w$ that is the unique neighbour of some $v \in S$ outside $S$ line 41 source
Source documentation
One step of the zero forcing colour-change rule: add to $S$ every vertex $w$ that is the unique neighbour of some $v \in S$ outside $S$.

standard axioms: Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext what this means
Statement uses: Fintype, DecidableEq, SimpleGraph, DecidableRel, SimpleGraph.Adj, Finset
Proof uses: Union.union, Finset.filter, And, Not, Membership.mem, Exists, Eq, Finset.univ
9 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
```
noncomputable def zeroForcingStep {V : Type*} [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V]
    (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj] (S : Finset V) : Finset V :=
…
```
def Arxiv.«2507.17780».zeroForcingClosure The zero forcing closure: iterate zeroForcingStep until it stabilises line 47 source
Source documentation
The zero forcing closure: iterate zeroForcingStep until it stabilises.

standard axioms: Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext what this means
Statement uses: Fintype, DecidableEq, SimpleGraph, DecidableRel, SimpleGraph.Adj, Finset
Proof uses: Nat.iterate, Arxiv.«2507.17780».zeroForcingStep, Fintype.card
```
noncomputable def zeroForcingClosure {V : Type*} [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V]
    (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj] (S : Finset V) : Finset V :=
…
```
def Arxiv.«2507.17780».IsZeroForcingSet A set $S$ is a zero forcing set of $G$ if its zero forcing closure is all of $V$ line 53 source
Source documentation
A set $S$ is a zero forcing set of $G$ if its zero forcing closure is all of $V$.

standard axioms: Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext what this means
Statement uses: Fintype, DecidableEq, SimpleGraph, DecidableRel, SimpleGraph.Adj, Finset
Proof uses: Eq, Arxiv.«2507.17780».zeroForcingClosure, Finset.univ
```
def IsZeroForcingSet {V : Type*} [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V]
    (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj] (S : Finset V) : Prop :=
…
```
def Arxiv.«2507.17780».zeroForcingNumber The zero forcing number of a finite simple graph: the minimum cardinality of a zero forcing set line 59 source
Source documentation
The zero forcing number of a finite simple graph: the minimum cardinality of a zero forcing set.

standard axioms: Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext what this means
Statement uses: Fintype, DecidableEq, SimpleGraph, DecidableRel, SimpleGraph.Adj, Nat
Proof uses: InfSet.sInf, Set.ofPred, Exists, Finset, And, Eq, Finset.card, Arxiv.«2507.17780».IsZeroForcingSet
1 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
```
noncomputable def zeroForcingNumber {V : Type*} [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V]
    (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj] : ℕ :=
…
```
theorem Arxiv.«2507.17780».tx_graffiti_conjecture_2 TxGraffiti Conjecture 2: for every connected graph $G$ with $\Delta(G) \le 3$ and $G \ne K_4$, $$Z(G) \le \alpha(G) + 1.$$ This conjecture is false sorry line 73 source
Source documentation
TxGraffiti Conjecture 2: for every connected graph $G$ with $\Delta(G) \le 3$ and $G \ne K_4$, $$Z(G) \le \alpha(G) + 1.$$
This conjecture is false. Fischer gives a connected 24-vertex counterexample with maximum degree $3$; see arXiv:2607.23664.

L4DEL explanation
TxGraffiti Conjecture 2: for every connected graph $G$ with $\Delta(G) \le 3$ and $G \ne K_4$, $$Z(G) \le \alpha(G) + 1.$$ This conjecture is false. Fischer gives a connected 24-vertex counterexample with maximum degree $3$; see arXiv:2607.23664.
Sources and attribution: Pinned Lean source (1646ca16afd6)

depends on sorry what this means
Statement uses: Iff, False, Fintype, DecidableEq, SimpleGraph, DecidableRel, SimpleGraph.Adj, SimpleGraph.Connected, LE.le, Nat, SimpleGraph.maxDegree, OfNat.ofNat, Eq, Top.top, Ne, Fintype.card, Arxiv.«2507.17780».zeroForcingNumber, HAdd.hAdd, SimpleGraph.indepNum
Proof uses: sorryAx, Lean.Name, Bool.false, Lean.Name.num, Lean.Name.str, Lean.Name.anonymous
16 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.

Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
```
theorem tx_graffiti_conjecture_2 : answer(False) ↔
    ∀ (V : Type) [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] (G : SimpleGraph V)
      [DecidableRel G.Adj] (_hConn : G.Connected)
      (_hDeg : G.maxDegree ≤ 3)
      (_hNotK4 : G = ⊤ → Fintype.card V ≠ 4),
      zeroForcingNumber G ≤ G.indepNum + 1 := by
…
```
Mentions: Arxiv.«2507.17780».zeroForcingNumber