hypermath | formal-universality | dictionary
substance is the second vertex of the triangle: what a form carries — its
content, its matter, the clay it is made of. substance(x) :: Prop asserts
that x has definite content. It is the middle vertex because syntax
generates it and it generates semantics. The ax-sub-nec axiom
establishes that substance necessitates semantics.
substance :: Form -> Prop
Semantically closed in L1 Section IV: substance(x) := congruent-class(x) at =~ level.
substance
is a Prop — an assertion that content exists and is definite in this form.Clarifies the definition of =~ (congruent): x =~ y iff
substance(x) = substance(y). The opaque predicate substance :: Form -> Prop
is exactly what congruence tests.
Clarifies the triangle: syntax is the entry, substance is what
syntax fills, semantics is what substance projects into the
relational context.
The L0 Section VIII executive opaques each carry substance. syntax-opaque
carries the substance shape assignment; derives-opaque carries directed approach.
These are opaque substance assignments — their content is not further derived
within L0. The closes in L1 Section IV give each opaque its semantic content.
Clay on a potter's wheel after it has been given a shape but before it has been
fired. The shape is there (syntax). The material is there
(substance). It has not yet been placed in relation to other finished vessels
(semantics). It is mid-formation.
Whether substance at L2 becomes derivable from the derivation-matrix entries —
whether the substance of a form is its row in the D matrix — is OPEN.
If D[x] (the outgoing row) encodes substance, then substance dissolves into the
derivation matrix architecture and no longer needs to be a primitive
opaque. This would compose substance with congruent
and simulation into a single unified account via D.