OAI/Probability/InvariantIsing/Fields/FieldPublishedPairInput.lean
8 declarations, 0 contain sorry, 0 declared as axioms
The finite vector log-cosh specialization of Panchenko--Talagrand, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris I 345 (2007), 653--656, Section 3, Lemma 3.1, equation (8), p.655, and Corollary 3.2, equation (9), p.656.
Only bounded measurable tests of the common depth and two endpoint fields are retained. The statement specifies their law under the actual terminal tilt, before any spins or overlap expectations are evaluated. The finite marking theorem supplies this hypothesis.
- def
OAI.InvariantIsing.fieldStepVarianceline 23 - def
OAI.InvariantIsing.fieldVectorCoordinateLawline 28 - def
OAI.InvariantIsing.fieldVectorEndpointline 35 - def
OAI.InvariantIsing.fieldVectorTiltedPairMeanline 40 - def
OAI.InvariantIsing.FieldVectorAncestorPairLawline 49 - def
OAI.InvariantIsing.PanchenkoTalagrandFieldPairInputline 64Source documentation
Same published marking result as
PanchenkoTalagrandTensorPairInput, specialized to the separable vector terminal used after the cavity change of variables. No pressure, spin-moment, or limiting assertion is assumed.def PanchenkoTalagrandFieldPairInput : Prop := …
- lemma
OAI.InvariantIsing.fieldVectorTerminal_linearGrowthline 67 - theorem
OAI.InvariantIsing.fieldVectorFinitePath_exp_integrableline 83Source documentation
The actual terminal meets the published theorem's exponential moment condition on every finite Gaussian path, including degenerate increments.
theorem fieldVectorFinitePath_exp_integrable (N : ℕ) (hN : 0 < N) (n : ℕ) (v : ℕ → ℝ≥0) (z : Fin N → ℝ) : Integrable (fun w : Fin n → Fin N → ℝ => Real.exp (∑ j, Real.log (Real.cosh ((z + ∑ i, w i) j)))) (Measure.pi (fun i : Fin n => (vectorGaussianLaw N (v i) : Measure (Fin N → ℝ)))) := by …Mentions: OAI.InvariantIsing.vectorGaussianLaw