OAI/Combinatorics/ContingencyTables/Dense/DenseRationalKernel.lean
12 declarations, 0 contain sorry, 0 declared as axioms
Rational transition and walk laws for the actual dense bin chain
- def
OAI.ContingencyTables.GridBoundary.rationalProposalline 18 - def
OAI.ContingencyTables.GridBoundary.rationalMoveline 20 - def
OAI.ContingencyTables.GridBoundary.rationalTransitionline 25 - theorem
OAI.ContingencyTables.GridBoundary.rationalMove_castline 29 - theorem
OAI.ContingencyTables.GridBoundary.rationalTransition_castline 39 - def
OAI.ContingencyTables.GridBoundary.rationalTransitionLawline 50 - def
OAI.ContingencyTables.GridBoundary.rationalWalkline 63 - theorem
OAI.ContingencyTables.GridBoundary.rationalWalk_castline 68 - def
OAI.ContingencyTables.GridBoundary.rationalWalkLawline 80 - def
OAI.ContingencyTables.GridBoundary.rationalStationaryLawline 93 - theorem
OAI.ContingencyTables.GridBoundary.rationalStationaryLaw_castline 105 - theorem
OAI.ContingencyTables.GridBoundary.rationalWalkLaw_variationline 116Source documentation
The exact rational finite-walk law satisfies the dense sampler's mixing bound. The hypotheses are precisely the two published geometric inputs.
theorem rationalWalkLaw_variation (R : Option I → ℕ) (P : Option J → ℕ) (d : ℕ) (hd : 14 ≤ d) (hR : ∀ i, d ^ 12 ≤ R i) (hP : ∀ j, d ^ 12 ≤ P j) (hRmax : ∀ i, R (some i) ≤ R none) (hPmax : ∀ j, P (some j) ≤ P none) (hdimR : Fintype.card (Option I) ≤ d) (hdimP : Fintype.card (Option J) ≤ d) (hfree : Fintype.card (I × J) ≤ d) (htotal : ∑ i, R i = ∑ j, P j) (e : I × J ≃ Fin q) (hPL : PublishedInputs.FiniteBoxPrekopaLeindler q) (hCheeger : PublishedInputs.FiniteCheeger (Grid (I := Fin q) (4 * d ^ 8))) …Mentions: OAI.ContingencyTables.PublishedInputs.FiniteBoxPrekopaLeindler, OAI.ContingencyTables.PublishedInputs.FiniteCheeger, OAI.ContingencyTables.GridBoundary.Grid