FormalConjectures/WrittenOnTheWallII/GraphConjecture194.lean
3 declarations, 1 contain sorry, 0 declared as axioms
Written on the Wall II - Conjecture 194
Reference:E. DeLaVina, Written on the Wall II, Conjectures of Graffiti.pc
Counterexample
The conjecture is false. Take a clique on vertices 0, ..., 10, four additional vertices
11, ..., 14 adjacent to every clique vertex, and three leaves attached at 11, 12, and 14.
This connected graph has independence number 4, while the sum of the independence numbers of its
vertex neighbourhoods is 54, so their average is 3. Thus it satisfies the conjecture's
hypothesis with equality. However, its three leaves would all have to be endpoints of a Hamiltonian
path, which is impossible.
Imports (1)
- theorem
WrittenOnTheWallII.GraphConjecture194.conjecture194sorry line 57 sourcedepends on sorry what this means
Statement uses:
Iff,False,Fintype,DecidableEq,Nontrivial,SimpleGraph,SimpleGraph.Connected,LE.le,Real,SimpleGraph.indepNum,HAdd.hAdd,OfNat.ofNat, SimpleGraph.averageIndepNeighbors,Exists,SimpleGraph.Walk,SimpleGraph.Walk.IsHamiltonianProof uses:
sorryAx,Lean.Name,Bool.false,Lean.Name.num,Lean.Name.str,Lean.Name.anonymous,Nat15 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 9 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
- example
WrittenOnTheWallII.GraphConjecture194.(example at line 68)line 68 sourceSource documentation
The average indep-neighbors invariant
l Gis nonneg.example (G : SimpleGraph (Fin 3)) : 0 ≤ averageIndepNeighbors G := by …
- example
WrittenOnTheWallII.GraphConjecture194.(example at line 77)line 77 sourceSource documentation
The edgeless graph on 2 vertices has 2 vertices.
example : Fintype.card (Fin 2) = 2 := by decide …