FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/267.lean
Explanation legend Lean4 Domain Explanation Language (L4DEL)
L4DEL explanations are a separate layer. They do not change the Lean source. Intuition is explanatory prose; numbered items are a reading path; sources link the wording back to evidence.
- L4DEL
- Lean4 Domain Explanation Language
Credit: The upstream authors and contributors retain credit for the project and mathematics. lean4-explainer only renders their pinned source and adds the separately disclosed explanation layer.
Project sources: Pinned project documentation, Formal Conjectures paper, arXiv v1
4 declarations, 4 contain sorry, 0 declared as axioms
Erdős Problem 267
Reference: erdosproblems.com/267
Imports (1)
- theorem
Erdos267.erdos_267Let $F_1=F_2=1$ and $F_{n+1} = F_n + F_{n-1}$ be the Fibonacci sequence sorry line 36 sourceSource documentation
Let $F_1=F_2=1$ and $F_{n+1} = F_n + F_{n-1}$ be the Fibonacci sequence. Let $n_1 < n_2 < \dots$ be an infinite sequence with $\frac{n_{k+1}}{n_k} \ge c > 1$. Must $\sum_k \frac 1 {F_{n_k}}$ be irrational?
depends on sorry what this means
Statement uses:
Iff,True,Nat,Rat,GT.gt,OfNat.ofNat,StrictMono,LE.le,HDiv.hDiv,HAdd.hAdd,Irrational,tsum,Real,Nat.fib,SummationFilter.unconditionalProof uses:
sorryAx,Lean.Name,Bool.false,Lean.Name.num,Lean.Name.str,Lean.Name.anonymous40 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
theorem erdos_267 : answer(True) ↔ ∀ᵉ (n : ℕ → ℕ) (c > (1 : ℚ)), StrictMono n → (∀ k, c ≤ n (k+1) / n k) → Irrational (∑' k, 1 / (Nat.fib <| n k)) := by …Mentions: c
- theorem
Erdos267.erdos_267.variants.generalisation_ratio_limit_to_infinityLet $F_1=F_2=1$ and $F_{n+1} = F_n + F_{n-1}$ be the Fibonacci sequence sorry line 46 sourceSource documentation
Let $F_1=F_2=1$ and $F_{n+1} = F_n + F_{n-1}$ be the Fibonacci sequence. Let $n_1 < n_2 < \dots$ be an infinite sequence with $\frac {n_k}{k} \to \infty$. Must $\sum_k \frac 1 {F_{n_k}}$ be irrational?
depends on sorry what this means
Statement uses:
Iff,True,Nat,StrictMono,Filter.Tendsto,Real,HDiv.hDiv,HAdd.hAdd,OfNat.ofNat,Nat.succ,Filter.atTop,Irrational,tsum,Nat.fib,SummationFilter.unconditionalProof uses:
sorryAx,Lean.Name,Bool.false,Lean.Name.num,Lean.Name.str,Lean.Name.anonymous32 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
theorem erdos_267.variants.generalisation_ratio_limit_to_infinity : answer(sorry) ↔ ∀ (n : ℕ → ℕ), StrictMono n → Filter.Tendsto (fun k => (n (k+1) / k.succ : ℝ)) Filter.atTop Filter.atTop → Irrational (∑' k, 1 / (Nat.fib <| n k)) := by … - theorem
Erdos267.erdos_267.variants.specialization_pow_twosorry line 62 sourcedepends on sorry what this means
Statement uses:
Irrational,tsum,Real,Nat,HDiv.hDiv,OfNat.ofNat,Nat.fib,HPow.hPow,SummationFilter.unconditionalProof uses:
sorryAx,Lean.Name,Bool.false,Lean.Name.num,Lean.Name.str,Lean.Name.anonymous32 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
- theorem
Erdos267.erdos_267.variants.fibonacci_inverse_sumThe sum $\sum_n \frac 1 {F_{n}}$ itself was proved to be irrational by André-Jeannin sorry line 72 sourceSource documentation
The sum $\sum_n \frac 1 {F_{n}}$ itself was proved to be irrational by André-Jeannin.
Ref: André-Jeannin, Richard, Irrationalité de la somme des inverses de certaines suites récurrentes.
depends on sorry what this means
Statement uses:
Irrational,tsum,Real,Nat,HDiv.hDiv,OfNat.ofNat,Nat.fib,SummationFilter.unconditionalProof uses:
sorryAx,Lean.Name,Bool.false,Lean.Name.num,Lean.Name.str,Lean.Name.anonymous23 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.
Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
theorem erdos_267.variants.fibonacci_inverse_sum : Irrational <| ∑' k, 1 / (Nat.fib k) := by …