FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/1121.lean

GitHub source file

Explanation legend Lean4 Domain Explanation Language (L4DEL)

L4DEL explanations are a separate layer. They do not change the Lean source. Intuition is explanatory prose; numbered items are a reading path; sources link the wording back to evidence.

L4DEL
Lean4 Domain Explanation Language

Credit: The upstream authors and contributors retain credit for the project and mathematics. lean4-explainer only renders their pinned source and adds the separately disclosed explanation layer.

Project sources: Pinned project documentation, Formal Conjectures paper, arXiv v1

2 declarations, 2 contain sorry, 0 declared as axioms

Erdős Problem 1121

References:

Imports (1)
  1. theorem Erdos1121.erdos_1121 Documented declaration: erdos_1121 sorry line 49 source

    Source documentation

    If $C_1,\ldots,C_n$ are circles in $\mathbb{R}^2$ with radii $r_1,\ldots,r_n$ such that no line disjoint from all the circles divides them into two non-empty sets then the circles can be covered by a circle of radius $r=\sum r_i$.

    This is true, and was proved by Goodman and Goodman [GoGo45] (whose proof also generalises to higher dimensions). A generalisation to convex bodies was proved by Hadwiger [Ha47].

    An alternative proof is given by Bezdek and Litvak [BeLi16].

    depends on sorry what this means

    Statement uses: Nat, Fin, EuclideanSpace, Real, OfNat.ofNat, LT.lt, Ne, ENNReal, Membership.mem, Set, Metric.closedBall, Inner.inner, Or, Exists, LE.le, Set.iUnion, Finset.sum, Finset.univ

    Proof uses: sorryAx, Lean.Name, Bool.false, Lean.Name.num, Lean.Name.str, Lean.Name.anonymous

    66 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.

    Tactic trace: 1 steps

    Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.

    theorem erdos_1121 {n : ℕ} (c : Fin n → ℝ²) (r : Fin n → ℝ) (hr : ∀ i, 0 < r i)
        (hsep : ∀ (v : ℝ²) (t : ℝ), v ≠ 0 →
          (∀ i, ∀ p ∈ Metric.closedBall (c i) (r i), inner ℝ v p ≠ t) →
          (∀ i, inner ℝ v (c i) < t) ∨ (∀ i, t < inner ℝ v (c i))) :
        ∃ z : ℝ², (⋃ i, Metric.closedBall (c i) (r i)) ⊆ Metric.closedBall z (∑ i, r i) := by
    …

    Mentions: c

  2. theorem Erdos1121.erdos_1121.variants.higher_dimension Documented declaration: higher_dimension sorry line 63 source

    Source documentation

    The proof of Goodman and Goodman [GoGo45] also generalises to higher dimensions: if $B_1,\ldots,B_n$ are balls in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with radii $r_1,\ldots,r_n$ such that no hyperplane disjoint from all the balls divides them into two non-empty sets then the balls can be covered by a ball of radius $r=\sum r_i$.

    depends on sorry what this means

    Statement uses: Nat, Fin, EuclideanSpace, Real, LT.lt, OfNat.ofNat, Ne, ENNReal, Membership.mem, Set, Metric.closedBall, Inner.inner, Or, Exists, LE.le, Set.iUnion, Finset.sum, Finset.univ

    Proof uses: sorryAx, Lean.Name, Bool.false, Lean.Name.num, Lean.Name.str, Lean.Name.anonymous

    66 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.

    Tactic trace: 1 steps

    Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.

    theorem erdos_1121.variants.higher_dimension {d n : ℕ} (c : Fin n → EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d))
        (r : Fin n → ℝ) (hr : ∀ i, 0 < r i)
        (hsep : ∀ (v : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d)) (t : ℝ), v ≠ 0 →
          (∀ i, ∀ p ∈ Metric.closedBall (c i) (r i), inner ℝ v p ≠ t) →
          (∀ i, inner ℝ v (c i) < t) ∨ (∀ i, t < inner ℝ v (c i))) :
        ∃ z : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d),
          (⋃ i, Metric.closedBall (c i) (r i)) ⊆ Metric.closedBall z (∑ i, r i) := by
    …

    Mentions: c