3.lean`

Explanation legend Lean4 Domain Explanation Language (L4DEL)

L4DEL explanations are a separate layer. They do not change the Lean source. Intuition is explanatory prose; numbered items are a reading path; sources link the wording back to evidence.

L4DEL: Lean4 Domain Explanation Language

Annotation provenance. This overlay contains 10 curated AI-written annotations and 7190 mechanical source-derived annotations. They have not been human-reviewed as explanations; treat them as unverified and not mathematical authority. Retained generation history: The 71 original curated annotations were produced in a Claude Sonnet 5.5 session at medium effort; Claude Opus 5.5 is recorded in that session as the advisor model, not the direct author. The bulk source-derived expansion was generated mechanically from pinned source comments by tooling developed in a GPT-5.6 Sol session at ultra reasoning; GPT-5.6 Sol did not originate the quoted source prose. On 2026-10-17 the mechanically generated source-comment annotations of the Formal Conjectures, Carleson, FLT, PFR, CompFiles, Mathematics in Lean and Theorem Proving in Lean overlays were regenerated by the same generator after three corrections made in a Claude Sonnet 5.5 session: titles no longer cut a sentence inside mathematics or end on a dangling word, workflow markers are removed from the quoted prose, and declaration names follow the scanner's namespace resolution. The boilerplate step line was dropped, and comments that were only a row of dashes no longer yield annotations. No new prose was written and no human review is claimed.

Credit: The upstream authors and contributors retain credit for the project and mathematics. lean4-explainer only renders their pinned source and adds the separately disclosed explanation layer.

Project sources: Pinned project documentation, Formal Conjectures paper, arXiv v1

1 declarations, 1 contain sorry, 0 declared as axioms

TxGraffiti Conjecture 3: independent domination versus saturation (regular)

Reference: arxiv/2507.17780 In Reverie Together: Ten Years of Mathematical Discovery with a Machine Collaborator by Randy Davila, Boris Brimkov, Ryan Pepper

Conjecture 3 (open since 2020) asserts that for every $r$-regular graph $G$ (every vertex has degree $r$), $$i(G) \le \mu^*(G),$$ where $i(G)$ is the independent domination number and $\mu^*(G)$ the saturation number (minimum size of a maximal matching).

Imports (1)

FormalConjecturesUtil

theorem Arxiv.«2507.17780».tx_graffiti_conjecture_3 TxGraffiti Conjecture 3: for every $r$-regular graph $G$ ($r \ge 1$), $$i(G) \le \mu^*(G).$$ This conjecture is open sorry line 48 source
Source documentation
TxGraffiti Conjecture 3: for every $r$-regular graph $G$ ($r \ge 1$), $$i(G) \le \mu^*(G).$$
This conjecture is open.

L4DEL explanation
TxGraffiti Conjecture 3: for every $r$-regular graph $G$ ($r \ge 1$), $$i(G) \le \mu^*(G).$$ This conjecture is open.
Sources and attribution: Pinned Lean source (1646ca16afd6)

depends on sorry what this means
Statement uses: Fintype, DecidableEq, SimpleGraph, DecidableRel, SimpleGraph.Adj, Nat, Eq, SimpleGraph.degree, Membership.mem, Set, SimpleGraph.neighborSet, LE.le, OfNat.ofNat, SimpleGraph.indepDominationNumber, SimpleGraph.saturationNumber
Proof uses: sorryAx, Lean.Name, Bool.false, Lean.Name.num, Lean.Name.str, Lean.Name.anonymous
10 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.

Tactic trace: 1 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
```
theorem tx_graffiti_conjecture_3 (V : Type) [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V]
    (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj]
    (r : ℕ) (_hReg : ∀ v, G.degree v = r) (_hr : 1 ≤ r) :
    G.indepDominationNumber ≤ G.saturationNumber := by
…
```