Conjecture6_3.lean`

Explanation legend Lean4 Domain Explanation Language (L4DEL)

L4DEL explanations are a separate layer. They do not change the Lean source. Intuition is explanatory prose; numbered items are a reading path; sources link the wording back to evidence.

L4DEL: Lean4 Domain Explanation Language

Annotation provenance. This overlay contains 10 curated AI-written annotations and 7190 mechanical source-derived annotations. They have not been human-reviewed as explanations; treat them as unverified and not mathematical authority. Retained generation history: The 71 original curated annotations were produced in a Claude Sonnet 5.5 session at medium effort; Claude Opus 5.5 is recorded in that session as the advisor model, not the direct author. The bulk source-derived expansion was generated mechanically from pinned source comments by tooling developed in a GPT-5.6 Sol session at ultra reasoning; GPT-5.6 Sol did not originate the quoted source prose. On 2026-10-17 the mechanically generated source-comment annotations of the Formal Conjectures, Carleson, FLT, PFR, CompFiles, Mathematics in Lean and Theorem Proving in Lean overlays were regenerated by the same generator after three corrections made in a Claude Sonnet 5.5 session: titles no longer cut a sentence inside mathematics or end on a dangling word, workflow markers are removed from the quoted prose, and declaration names follow the scanner's namespace resolution. The boilerplate step line was dropped, and comments that were only a row of dashes no longer yield annotations. No new prose was written and no human review is claimed.

Credit: The upstream authors and contributors retain credit for the project and mathematics. lean4-explainer only renders their pinned source and adds the separately disclosed explanation layer.

Project sources: Pinned project documentation, Formal Conjectures paper, arXiv v1

1 declarations, 1 contain sorry, 0 declared as axioms

Central Binomial Tail Bounds, Conjecture 6.3

Reference: arxiv/0911.2077 Central Binomial Tail Bounds by Matus Telgarsky

Imports (1)

FormalConjecturesUtil

theorem Arxiv.«0911.2077».arxiv.id0911_2077.conjecture6_3 Empirical evidence seems to suggest that Slud's bound does not hold for all $p$, and in fact, as $n\to\infty$, the maximal permissible $p$ shrinks to $\frac{1}{2}$ sorry line 51 source
Source documentation
Empirical evidence seems to suggest that Slud's bound does not hold for all $p$, and in fact, as $n\to\infty$, the maximal permissible $p$ shrinks to $\frac{1}{2}$. Also, the following appears to be true:
When $p\in(0,1/2)$ and $m = 2k$ is even, and $\sigma := \sqrt{p(1-p)}$, $$ \mathbb{P}[B(p,m) \geq m/2] \geq 1 - \Phi\left(\frac{(1/2-p)\sqrt{m}}{\sigma}\right) + \frac 1 2\binom{m}{m/2}\sigma^{m}. $$
A solution of this statement has been put out by Logical Intelligence https://github.com/logical-intelligence/proofs, see here for and informal sketch of the proof.

L4DEL explanation
Empirical evidence seems to suggest that Slud's bound does not hold for all $p$, and in fact, as $n\to\infty$, the maximal permissible $p$ shrinks to $\frac{1}{2}$. Also, the following appears to be true: When $p\in(0,1/2)$ and $m = 2k$ is even, and $\sigma := \sqrt{p(1-p)}$, $$ \mathbb{P}[B(p,m) \geq m/2] \geq 1 - \Phi\left(\frac{(1/2-p)\sqrt{m}}{\sigma}\right) + \frac 1 2\binom{m}{m/2}\sigma^{m}. $$ A solution of this statement has been put out by Logical Intelligence https://github.com/logical-intelligence/proofs, see here for and informal sketch of the proof.
Sources and attribution: Pinned Lean source (1646ca16afd6)

depends on sorry what this means
Statement uses: Real, Membership.mem, Set, Set.Ioo, OfNat.ofNat, HDiv.hDiv, Nat, LT.lt, Eq, Real.sqrt, HMul.hMul, HSub.hSub, LE.le, HAdd.hAdd, ProbabilityTheory.cdf, ProbabilityTheory.gaussianReal, NNReal, OrderIso, NNReal.sqrt, Nat.choose and 9 more
Proof uses: sorryAx, Lean.Name, Bool.false, Lean.Name.num, Lean.Name.str, Lean.Name.anonymous
102 instances, coercions and auxiliary constants left out.

Tactic trace: 4 steps
Open to load the checked before-and-after goal states.
```
theorem arxiv.id0911_2077.conjecture6_3
    (p : ℝ) (h_p : p ∈ Set.Ioo 0 (1 / 2)) (k : ℕ) (hk : 0 < k)
    (σ : ℝ) (h_σ : σ = (p * (1 - p)).sqrt) :
    letI hp' : (⟨p, le_of_lt h_p.1⟩ : ℝ≥0) ≤ 1 := by
…
```